Mat Bowles

Insert Humour Here

TrustFlow results for <lj user=”matgb”>

So…
Via

I tried out TrustFlow II for LiveJournal. The following people not on the friends list for are close by:

  • (200 - 250)
  • , , (250 - 300)
  • , , , , , (300 - 350)

  • , , , , , , (350 - 400)
  • , , , , , , , , , (400 - 450)
  • , , , , , , , , , , , (450 - 500)
  • , , , , , , , , , (500 - 550)
  • , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (550 - 600)
  • , , , , , , , , , , , , (600 - 650)
  • , , , , , , , , , , , , (650 - 700)
  • , , , , , , , , (700 - 750)

Created by ciphergoth; hosted by LShift.

TrustFlow II: Who is closest to your friends
list?


From what I can see from the description and FAQ it’s a bit like the pagerank formula for Google, the less ‘friends’ each of my friends have, the more ‘trust’ is spread onto them, and those who are friends of more than one of my friends will also get more.

Slightly skewed by me having loads of friends and some of them being inactive accounts (’s girlfriend being one, for example, he hasn’t updated for years (although his article on Taktix is still one of the most linked to and read). Not sure if it’s worth anything, but still. Think of it as a “you should friend this person” if you get results below about 100 for anyone.

March 30th, 2006 Posted by MatGB | Uncategorized | 4 comments

« Previous | Next »

4 Comments »

  1. That’s really interesting. I have a whole host of people from 150-200… and a handful under 100.

    Comment by lmnicole | March 29, 2006

  2. In your case, Jeremy and Tracy’s friends, as they’ve got very few each, are at the top.

    I only had to look one of them up, it appears my ’screenname blankness’ is (was?) Temple-specific.

    Comment by matgb | March 29, 2006

  3. Makes a lot of sense - especially because the both rarely post.

    BTW - you still owe me an email about Taktix.

    Comment by lmnicole | March 29, 2006

  4. True, been sidetracked by intense insomnia :-(
    Short version; gaming blog site, each contributor gets their own ‘column’, and editors for each game supported run the main page which would be news, links and recommended links; ie if someone writes a good article, you link a brief synopsis on the front page, etc.

    Huge advantage is a) doesn’t rely on any one person (ie if I get swamped, have a flake attack or disappear offline it’ll still keep going) and b) everyone controls thier own content.

    Interested/able to either edit or contribute?

    Comment by matgb | March 29, 2006

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.